Meaning created through media
"Denotation" tends to be described as the definitional, 'literal', 'obvious' or 'commonsense' meaning of a sign. In the case of linguistic signs, the "denotative" meaningis what the dictionary attempts to provide. So the linguistic sign "Ferrari" on an f450 Spider "denotes" and Italian road car produced by the car manufacturer Ferrari. The term "conotation" is used to refer to the socio-cultural and 'personal' associations (ideological, emotional etc.) of the sign. These are typically related to the interpreter's class, age, gender, ethnicity and so on. So the linguistic sign "Ferrari" might "conote" high economic status, middle age, patriarchy, aesthetic over functionality (for example a Nissan GTR R35 can outdrive a Ferrari on a 0-60 speed test but a prospective buyer might still opt for the Ferrari owing to its socially perceived superior design aesthetic). Signs are more 'polysemic' - more open to interpretation - in their "conotation" than their "denotation".
"Signified" (signifie): For Saussure, the "signified" was one part of the "sign". Saussure's "signified" is the mental concept represented by the "signifier" (and is not a material thing)." "(Signifiant): For Saussure, this was the other part of the "sign". In the Saussurean tradition, the "signified" is the form which a "sign" takes. Ferdinand de Saussure proposed tht a word or "sign" links a concept ("signified") with a sound or image ("signifier"). The relationship between the "signs " and "signifier" is arbitrary. Words or "signs" are merely arbitrary man-made concepts. "Signifiers " on their own have no meaning. A "sign" only has meaning as a part of a system (structure). The meaning of words or "signs" emerges out of the differences that set them apart from other " signs" within the overarching system/structure. Modern semiotics invovles the study not only of what we refer to as "signs" in everyday speech, but of anything which 'stands for' something else. In a semiotic sense, "signs" take the form of words, images, sounds, gestures and objects. Contemporary semioticians study "sign" not in isolation but as part of semiotic "sign systems" (such as a medium or genre). They study how meanings are made: as such, being concerned not only with communication but also with the construction and maintenance of reality. Semiotics and that branch of linguistics known as semantics have a common concern with the meaning of "signs", but whereas semantics focuses on what words mean, semiotics is concerned with how "signs" mean.
"Iconography" in a text echoes the genre codes of narrative, characterization, themes and setting - a familiar stock of images or motifs, the connotations of which have become fixed; primarily but not necessarily visual, including decor, costume and objects, certain 'tpecast' performers (some of whom may hve become 'icons'), familiar patternsof dialogue, characteristic music and sounds, andappropriate physical topograpy. social realist filmmakers have often used the classic "iconography" of narrowstreets lined with tiny urban dwellings in estavlishing shotsof northern industrial towns to portray economic hardship.
The French literary theorist and semiotician Roland Barthes introduced the concept of "anchorage". Linguistic elements in a text (such as a caption) canserve to "anchors" (or constrain) the preferred readings of an image (conversely the illustrative use of an image can "anchor" anambiguous verbal text).
"Signified" (signifie): For Saussure, the "signified" was one part of the "sign". Saussure's "signified" is the mental concept represented by the "signifier" (and is not a material thing)." "(Signifiant): For Saussure, this was the other part of the "sign". In the Saussurean tradition, the "signified" is the form which a "sign" takes. Ferdinand de Saussure proposed tht a word or "sign" links a concept ("signified") with a sound or image ("signifier"). The relationship between the "signs " and "signifier" is arbitrary. Words or "signs" are merely arbitrary man-made concepts. "Signifiers " on their own have no meaning. A "sign" only has meaning as a part of a system (structure). The meaning of words or "signs" emerges out of the differences that set them apart from other " signs" within the overarching system/structure. Modern semiotics invovles the study not only of what we refer to as "signs" in everyday speech, but of anything which 'stands for' something else. In a semiotic sense, "signs" take the form of words, images, sounds, gestures and objects. Contemporary semioticians study "sign" not in isolation but as part of semiotic "sign systems" (such as a medium or genre). They study how meanings are made: as such, being concerned not only with communication but also with the construction and maintenance of reality. Semiotics and that branch of linguistics known as semantics have a common concern with the meaning of "signs", but whereas semantics focuses on what words mean, semiotics is concerned with how "signs" mean.
"Iconography" in a text echoes the genre codes of narrative, characterization, themes and setting - a familiar stock of images or motifs, the connotations of which have become fixed; primarily but not necessarily visual, including decor, costume and objects, certain 'tpecast' performers (some of whom may hve become 'icons'), familiar patternsof dialogue, characteristic music and sounds, andappropriate physical topograpy. social realist filmmakers have often used the classic "iconography" of narrowstreets lined with tiny urban dwellings in estavlishing shotsof northern industrial towns to portray economic hardship.
The French literary theorist and semiotician Roland Barthes introduced the concept of "anchorage". Linguistic elements in a text (such as a caption) canserve to "anchors" (or constrain) the preferred readings of an image (conversely the illustrative use of an image can "anchor" anambiguous verbal text).
No comments:
Post a Comment